We aim to correct material errors and explain conflicts between product promotions and documented seller or payment terms.
What warrants a correction
A changed price, updated refund rule, incorrect source, broken purchase route or misleading factual statement deserves review.
Issues that affect readers’ money, private data or purchase expectations receive priority.
Resolve conflicts transparently
If one promotion mentions a 30-day guarantee and another 60 days, the site should state the discrepancy and direct readers to their order-specific terms, not silently choose a favorable number.
A seller claim is not independent verification of paranormal accuracy.
Update dates meaningfully
Page review dates should indicate real editorial verification. We do not automatically refresh them as a search-engine tactic.
A working editorial correspondence address still needs to be established by the site owner before a public launch.
Source transparency
We identify external references and distinguish factual documentation from interpretation. We do not manufacture customer reviews, medical experts or nonexistent studies.
Explore next
Sources and further reading
These sources document seller claims, purchasing guidance or consumer research. They do not prove psychic accuracy. Check the current vendor terms before purchasing.
- Seller affiliate guidelines — external source
- ClickBank — Refund and subscription cancellation policy — external source
- US FTC — Endorsement Guides and affiliate disclosure — external source