Our editorial standard is to distinguish seller advertising from independent evidence, disclose compensation, and not imply that spiritual portraits scientifically predict future partners.
Evidence hierarchy
For offer mechanics we prioritize seller checkout information and publicly documented affiliate terms; for transactions we use ClickBank policies and support information; for endorsement standards we use FTC guidance.
We describe unresolved conflicts such as inconsistent refund windows rather than selecting the most persuasive promotional statement.
Financial disclosures and impartiality
Affiliate commission does not justify hiding purchase risks or inventing customer outcomes. Paid links are identified close to relevant calls to action.
We do not use fake scarcity, success percentages, clinical endorsements or aggregated review stars.
Accuracy and updates
Articles include editorial review dates and source notes. When material facts change, the relevant page should be updated only after review rather than automatically refreshing its date.
We do not claim personal customer testing or specialist review that has not occurred.
Corrections
Material corrections should be documented as the publication matures. The owner has not yet supplied an editorial inbox, so a working correction contact is an outstanding launch requirement.
We will not invent contact details simply to make a policy look complete.
Explore next
Sources and further reading
These sources document seller claims, purchasing guidance or consumer research. They do not prove psychic accuracy. Check the current vendor terms before purchasing.
- Seller affiliate guidelines — external source
- US FTC — Endorsement Guides and affiliate disclosure — external source
- APA Dictionary — Behavioral confirmation — external source